Mr. Musk is correct, Twitter badly limits free speech – GIS Reports

Tech tycoons have the potential to make bad business decisions, just like the rest. However, you shouldn’t criticize them for their freedom of speech.

Elon Musk: “If people want less free speech, they will ask the government to pass laws to that effect.” © GIS

Elon Musk, a visionary South African-born American entrepreneur. Automotive and space industries, has acquired, in a roller-coaster-like process, the ownership of the social medium Twitter.

Twitter is generally a loss-making enterprise. In 2018And 2019, it turned profits, but two exceptional years could not outweigh the eight years of losing money. Twitter’s primary income comes from advertising, which appeared to be fading even before Mr. Musk’s disruptive acquisition.

The new owner had promised to get rid of them “bot accounts”(set up by digital robotics) and restore the freedom of speech norms. Twitter had policies in place to block hate-mongering and also messages its users considered false, such Covid-19 policies, environmental and contested politics issues. Undeniably, “progressive”Twitter users were less likely than conservatives to block opinions.

This is a great idea!

Musk stated his policy here: “By freedom of expression, I mean only what is lawful. I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law. If people want less free speech, they will ask the government to pass laws to that effect. Therefore, breaking the law is against the will of the people.” 

There is nothing to be said against this. A free and democratic society is Resilient enough to deal with liesYou can be a fool, have unrealistic opinions and just plain stupid. However, restricting speech freedom can be fatal to such a society.

Still, Mr. Musk’s statement made some people nervous. Many people thought his comments opened the floodgates for hate speech. This is not true, hate speech is illegal. 

Follow us on Twitter or Pinterest or Google News: Read the latest content, follow us and get notified when the new article is being published.
Shop Now

When the new boss tweeted “the bird is free,” Thierry Breton, the European Commission’s market czar, responded indignantly: “In Europe, the bird will fly by our rules.”Is this a sign that the commission plans to limit social media? This principalist attitude is similar to that of an authoritarian mindset. Instead of responding to any challenge the commission may face, it should reduce its size Suffocating regulations preventing Europe from developing competitive high-tech businesses.

In Europe, public broadcasting, which generally has a leftist bias, reacted with rage to Mr. Musk’s plans. Some of the comments circulating on Twitter’s possibly more open policy were outrageous. In a parody run by German public broadcaster ARD, Mr. Musk was very clearly compared to Hitler’s minister of propaganda, Josef Goebbels. That was rightfully criticised. Anna Staroselski, president of the Jewish Student Union in Germany, said in an interview that one does not have to like Musk’s Twitter acquisition. But, comparing Musk’s efforts to protect freedom of expression to a dictatorship that killed people with disagreeable views was an apt comparison. “not only oblivious to history but shabby.”

What we must tolerate

Why is it so bad that Mr. Musk took control of Twitter It’s very popular for short messages. Nearly all politicians and celebrities use it. It is also a good tool for populist influencers. But, there is no reason for a free country to fear the damaging influence of any eccentric tycoon. Mr. Musk has not caused any harm. Previous balance of opinions running on Twitter.

Democracies and societies that are free and open to speech need respect for those who disagree with them, as long as they don’t violate the law. Unwelcome or even stupid statements must be tolerated. While denigrating climate change might be a good idea, it is not a good idea. Considered unwiseAccept it, however, it is not illegal. Twitter banned anti-vaccination messages. We now know this. Some skepticism was justified even if the overall outcome may have been positive.

The above does not mean that all of Mr. Musk’s actions are above criticism. While Twitter’s headcount was evidently bloated, the manner in which he fired and alienated so many employees (some of whom he later had to beg to come back) shows rather alarming overconfidence in the new boss. It is not true that even the most successful tech entrepreneurs can always be right. Mark Zuckerberg’s epic overinvestment in his “metaverse”Bet is yet another example of how pride can lead to destruction and a proud spirit can lead to a fall.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *